I
came into Harems and Terrorists thinking I would only learn about
representation of Arabs and Muslims. I have learned that, but I have
also learned key critical analyzing tools in which I can recognize
power structures and realize when images are being shown in a
ethnocentric light. I honestly never understood this idea of
commodification
until this class. I did not realize that I had internalized so many
images and ways of different cultures that I too was commodifying
many cultures. I had heard of news stories in which people wanted the
Native American to not be a mascot and I did not understand why they
thought this was insulting. I thought the mascot was instead used to
honor the Native Americans and I thought that was lovely. It was
incredibly Eurocentric
view in which I had internalized this idea of tribal culture being
something that could be displayed in setting that got taken out of
its true context.
But,
that was because I knew nothing of Native American culture. The dance
the chief does as a mascot is actually a ritual and is done
completely wrong. You cannot honor a culture by degrading their
rituals and dress up a mascot without actually understanding the
culture in the first place. This was commodification; when the
intentions of using culture are more for entertainment than
recognizing the culture. I was able to step back and take off my own
cultural lens and understand the culture before making assumptions on
how it should be portrayed. I find it so important to understand this
cultural
relativism so
we can better understand the world around us without biases and
judgments.
I
love Selena Gomez but was incredibly disappointed by her description
of her latest song and music video which she described to have a
“tribal, exotic feel” in which she has a Native American head
piece, an Indian religious bindi, and some sort of Hawaiian/Bollywood
mix dancing going on. The music in itself seems like it had
Arab/Bollywood influences. I am sure she does not know it – but she
is selling different cultural dances and clothing as something
“tribal and exotic.” By exoticizing
the notion of this far away culture, she makes it seem as if she is
appreciating it when really she is just using a culture she knows
nothing about to sell her own work. I know she does not mean to so I
do not blame her as much as I blame society to not have this
initiative to understand different cultures and to be careful about
their customs and ways.
Little
did I know, commodities of cultures existed all around me even of my
own South Asian background? Personally, it bothers me especially
because my mother did not enjoy wearing American clothing (until a
couple of years ago). She felt most comfortable in her shalwar
kameez which
is the normal South Asian dress and she wore it for years. I,
sometimes, felt embarrassed for my mother because she would get the
strangest looks. I don’t think I have gotten that many looks from
people when I was wearing the hijab probably because I was still
dressed in the typical t-shirt and jeans. But, my mom always was
looked down upon as if she was some fresh off the boat immigrant.
But, it was her choice to wear what she wanted to wear – she had
every right. I guess it bothers me when that same dress put on some
magazine cover or worn by some actress is seen as a fashion statement
even though technically it is in that case when the dress should be
looked down upon or look at weirdly because of how out of context it
is. By exoticizing
the notion of this seemingly other worldly culture, it makes the idea
of people actually wearing those clothes seem far-fetched and has an
impact on how people will see those clothes in true context like on
my mom. I want people to be careful at how they use certain cultural
items and understand the culture and your own intentions of using it
before actually using it or especially selling it.
No comments:
Post a Comment